Revelation, an introductory note(part 1)

I started this blog with the intention of ministering to people with the tiny bit of knowledge I have been given. I am an avid reader and often times find myself in paradigm struggles. These have molded me in many ways. As one who asks questions better than answering them, I often spend hours studying and reading until all my questions feel adequately answered. That is why I am starting this series on Revelation. Let me begin by saying there are many schools of thought on the book. In this post I want to discuss the different views and why I feel like the school of thought I ascribe to makes the most sense. There are 4 schools of thought on revelation: preterist, futurist, idealist, and historicist. The preterist interprets most or all of revelation as having been fulfilled in 70ad with the seige of Jerusalem. The futurist interprets it all as happening right before the second advent of Christ. The idealist sees it as more of a spiritual pattern that will go until the second coming. The historicist interprets revelation as a picture of literal history. All these views can be found in many different church traditions. There is some general consensus though. Most of the lay people ascribe to the futurist school of thought. Whereas most scholars ascribe to the preterist and idealist schools of thought. Historicism is basically dead, except for the campbellites and their various split offs. I do not think the futurist view is tenable, for it often makes Revelation mean nothing to the people whom it was written to in first century Asia Minor. Preterism, though often very scholarly, seems to fail in a couple of ways. The bowls of wrath contrast the trumpets and the seals, in that, in them the wrath of God is complete. Furthermore, there is a clear “there will be no more time…” before the bowls are started. So there must be some parts that go beyond 70ad. Revelation is a common genre of literature in Judaism from 200bc-400ad, it is a part of a long list of apocalyptic literature. Apocalyptic literature isn’t really something that you are supposed to extract every little detail from. It’s usually a series of images that are meant to startle you to help you see what’s truly happening. That is to say, the spiritual realities. This is why I hold to, mostly, an idealist point of view, with some hints of the preterist understanding. I hope to, if nothing else, get you interested in most beautiful book.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s